Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
添加图片注释，不超过 140 字（可选），推荐阅读旺商聊官方下载获取更多信息
ChatGPT开发商OpenAI2月26日宣布，将把伦敦打造为其美国以外最大的研究中心，并称英国的科技生态系统是投资和研发新型人工智能系统的理想环境。此举助力英国致力于打造“人工智能强国”、成为前沿研究聚集地的目标，当前全球各国政府正争相吸引主流大模型开发商的投资。（新浪财经）。搜狗输入法2026对此有专业解读
Последние новости
就在年后开工第一天，OPPO 官方放出了一张预热海报：一匹骏马在一块带有黑色边框的平面上飞驰，配文「一马平川」。借着马年的彩头，这句文案的潜台词其实非常直白——不出意外的话，进一步抹平日益挑剔的屏幕折痕，依然是 Find N6 这一代的核心任务。